Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP Regime is “Rotting” According to the Reasoning of Heng Swee Keat
1 December 2023
What do I mean when I say that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting”?
I have been asked what I meant by the word “rot” when I wrote that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting.” Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” in the sense in which Heng Swee Keat used the words “rotting” and “rot” during a speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015, when Heng Swee Keat said that “the Town Council is rotting. And the rot is serious. … the Workers’ Party has betrayed the people’s trust. The pattern of behaviour; the consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection of the Managing Agent which suggests a serious rot is happening.”
Today, Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is clearly “rotting” and “the rot is serious” and the PAP regime “has betrayed the people’s trust” with a “pattern of behaviour” that includes a “consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection” by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime and Lee Hsien Loong’s Attorney-General, in favour of the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, Justice of the Peace, and this “suggests a serious rot is happening.” I am simply applying the terminology that was used by Heng Swee Keat in his big speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015.
If Heng Swee Keat could publicly accuse the Workers’ Party of betraying the people’s trust, by allegedly protecting the management agent of a town council, then it is only fair to conclude that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime “has betrayed the people’s trust” with a “pattern of behaviour” that includes a “consistent pattern” of protecting the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, Justice of the Peace.
In a twist of irony, the Town Councillors from the Workers’ Party who were sued for the alleged “rot” won the lawsuit after appeal in November 2023. This is a rare legal victory in the city-state where opposition politicians and critics of the regime are most likely than not the losers when dragged into legal cases as such. However, Heng Swee Keat’s definition of “rot” is here to stay and can be, and in fact, must be, equally applied to assessing the conduct of PAP government officials.
As the current President of Singapore Management University (SMU), as well as being a Justice of the Peace and a member of the “elite” Public Service Commission, the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, is a much more prominent “elite” than the managing agent of a town council. Therefore, the ongoing protection of the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime, reveals that the PAP regime is now seriously rotting.
For more information and details on the fact that Lee Hsien Loong has been personally informed about Lily Kong’s perjury, in several emails sent to his official email address, yet he has failed to follow up on these written complaints, in spite of the solemn promises that he made to the nation in his big speech about perjury, see the Open Letter to Lee Hsien Loong that has been online on Facebook since November 2022.
Singaporeans should ask Lee Hsien Loong to explain why he is now breaking the solemn promises that he made to the nation, in his big speech about perjury in Parliament on 15 February 2022, when Lee Hsien Loong solemnly promised the nation that the law against perjury would be strictly enforced, and that all perjurers would be brought to justice and punished.
I have already written to Lee Hsien Loong several times, but Lee Hsien Loong has arrogantly, cavalierly and high-handedly ignored my complaints about Lily Kong, just like the PAP regime once ignored complaints about former NKF CEO T.T. Durai. Apparently, the PAP regime failed to learn the obvious lessons from the NKF Scandal.
On 21 December 2005, Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan issued a public “Statement” about the NKF Scandal, in which he admitted that: “no one took serious heed of earlier signs of trouble … I understand that the regulators did occasionally receive informal but often anonymous feedback on the NKF. … allegations of the CEO’s lavish lifestyle. … The regulators were also reassured by periodic assessments given by the NKF auditors … We now know that we have been misled. Perhaps, we were coloured by our deeply-held and positive view of the original NKF … we were not alone in missing those early signs. … media reports on NKF around that period … were many, and the strong support and praise of the NKF were palpable. Even as late as this year, during the trial on SPH’s defamation case [sic; actually Durai’s defamation suit against SPH], many still came forward to defend Mr T.T. Durai.” (Emphasis added.) Source: Statement by Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan on KPMG’s Report on the National Kidney Foundation in a “Singapore Government Media Release” issued on 21 December 2005.
What do I mean when I say that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting”?
I have been asked what I meant by the word “rot” when I wrote that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting.” Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” in the sense in which Heng Swee Keat used the words “rotting” and “rot” during a speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015, when Heng Swee Keat said that “the Town Council is rotting. And the rot is serious. … the Workers’ Party has betrayed the people’s trust. The pattern of behaviour; the consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection of the Managing Agent which suggests a serious rot is happening.”
Today, Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is clearly “rotting” and “the rot is serious” and the PAP regime “has betrayed the people’s trust” with a “pattern of behaviour” that includes a “consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection” by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime and Lee Hsien Loong’s Attorney-General, in favour of the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, Justice of the Peace, and this “suggests a serious rot is happening.” I am simply applying the terminology that was used by Heng Swee Keat in his big speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015.
If Heng Swee Keat could publicly accuse the Workers’ Party of betraying the people’s trust, by allegedly protecting the management agent of a town council, then it is only fair to conclude that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime “has betrayed the people’s trust” with a “pattern of behaviour” that includes a “consistent pattern” of protecting the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, Justice of the Peace.
As the saying goes, “what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.” By Heng Swee Keat’s own reasoning, the scandal-ridden PAP regime is now “rotting.” The proof that the PAP regime is “rotting” is found in the PAP regime’s ongoing, continuing protection of the deeply dishonest, “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, Justice of the Peace.
As the current President of Singapore Management University (SMU), as well as being a Justice of the Peace and a member of the “elite” Public Service Commission, the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong, BBM, is a much more prominent “elite” than the managing agent of a town council. Therefore, the ongoing protection of the “elite” criminal and perjurer Lily Kong by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime, reveals that the PAP regime is now seriously rotting.
Lee Hsien Loong must be held personally responsible and accountable for the “rot” in the PAP regime under his “leadership.” As the saying goes, “a fish rots from the head down.” Lee Hsien Loong must be held personally responsible and accountable for the ongoing protection of the “elite” perjurer Lily Kong, because Lee Hsien Loong has been personally informed about Lily Kong’s perjury.
Singaporeans should ask Lee Hsien Loong to explain why he is now breaking the solemn promises that he made to the nation, in his big speech about perjury in Parliament on 15 February 2022, when Lee Hsien Loong solemnly promised the nation that the law against perjury would be strictly enforced, and that all perjurers would be brought to justice and punished.
Honest Singaporeans can write to Lee Hsien Loong at his official email address, which is: lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg
I have already written to Lee Hsien Loong several times, but Lee Hsien Loong has arrogantly, cavalierly and high-handedly ignored my complaints about Lily Kong, just like the PAP regime once ignored complaints about former NKF CEO T.T. Durai. Apparently, the PAP regime failed to learn the obvious lessons from the NKF Scandal.
On 21 December 2005, Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan issued a public “Statement” about the NKF Scandal, in which he admitted that: “no one took serious heed of earlier signs of trouble … I understand that the regulators did occasionally receive informal but often anonymous feedback on the NKF. … allegations of the CEO’s lavish lifestyle. … The regulators were also reassured by periodic assessments given by the NKF auditors … We now know that we have been misled. Perhaps, we were coloured by our deeply-held and positive view of the original NKF … we were not alone in missing those early signs. … media reports on NKF around that period … were many, and the strong support and praise of the NKF were palpable. Even as late as this year, during the trial on SPH’s defamation case [sic; actually Durai’s defamation suit against SPH], many still came forward to defend Mr T.T. Durai.” (Emphasis added.) Source: Statement by Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan on KPMG’s Report on the National Kidney Foundation in a “Singapore Government Media Release” issued on 21 December 2005.
Today, in 2023, Lee Hsien Loong and his rotting PAP regime, are repeating the mistakes that the PAP regime made when it failed to heed the complaints about former NKF CEO T.T. Durai. This is a gross dereliction of duty on the part of Lee Hsien Loong and his rotting PAP regime. This gross dereliction of duty regarding the Lily Kong Scandal, is especially inexcusable, reprehensible and disgraceful, in view of the fact that Lee Hsien Loong and his rotting PAP regime should have learned their lesson from the PAP regime’s infamous mishandling of the NKF Scandal. For more information, see the Wikipedia article: National Kidney Foundation Singapore Scandal
Today, Singaporeans should do what they can to publicise the Lily Kong Scandal online, not for my sake, but for the sake of Singapore, and for the sake of future generations of Singaporeans.
If honest Singaporeans don’t stop this rot now, the rot will continue to spread, and Singapore may decline into a corrupt Third World “banana republic” and a “failed state.” The future of Singapore depends on honest Singaporeans standing up for Singapore today!
Today, Singaporeans should do what they can to publicise the Lily Kong Scandal online, not for my sake, but for the sake of Singapore, and for the sake of future generations of Singaporeans.
If honest Singaporeans don’t stop this rot now, the rot will continue to spread, and Singapore may decline into a corrupt Third World “banana republic” and a “failed state.” The future of Singapore depends on honest Singaporeans standing up for Singapore today!
For more information about the Lily Kong Scandal, see:
Jeanne Ten’s Long Struggle for Accountability in Singapore by
Nicholas Haggerty in The News Lens International
Lily Kong is the Perjurer; Wong Yunn Chii is the Plagiarist (my blog)
AGC Denies Consent for Private Prosecution of Perjury by Former NUS Student Against SMU President in The Online Citizen.
The article also provides a link to an expert opinion report from a British law professor, Professor David Lewis, regarding the documentary evidence that proves that Lily Kong committed the crime of perjury.
A Facebook post about the Lily Kong Scandal
