30 September 2026 I am writing about something uncomfortable and embarrassing, but sometimes the most uncomfortable stories are precisely the ones that need to be told. I have already written to the State Courts to address the fundamental issues of hygiene and humane treatment of Persons in Custody, because what happened to me should never be standard practice. Here is a more detailed account of that ugly episode. On 28 September, I was detained at the State Courts’ holding centre while waiting for my bail to be processed. Yes, I’ve been charged under the Public Order Act, but that’s another story for another day. After being formally charged, I was shackled and handcuffed and brought to the holding centre at the basement of the State Courts, where I was detained for almost 4 hours. The holding centre was like a mini-jail, with cells lining both sides of a long corridor. There were about 12 cells. I noticed a sign inscribed with “PIC” on the wall, so calling those detained there “PICs...
CIVICUS Monitor has recognised my struggle for justice and accountability in its 2024 country report on Singapore . Not only does my whistleblowing and the state-backed campaign of retaliation against me highlight academic misconduct, systemic institutional cover-ups, and the abuse of power by establishment elites under Lawrence Wong ' s PAP regime, it also underscores the importance of protecting whistleblowers and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability within public institutions. The concept of a “ restrict[ive] civic space ” often evokes images of dissidents or critics being actively persecuted by authoritarian regimes. However, the definition of “a dissident” should extend beyond those who are the targets of overt acts of repression. The “ state policy of silencing dissent ” can also manifest in more subtle ways. What happens when state agents commit wrongdoing, and the state refuses to admit it, much less to take responsibility, while simultaneously suppresses...
1 December 2023 What do I mean when I say that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” ? I have been asked what I meant by the word “rot” when I wrote that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting.” Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” in the sense in which Heng Swee Keat used the words “rotting” and “rot” during a speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015 , when Heng Swee Keat said that “ the Town Council is rotting. And the rot is serious. … the Workers’ Party has betrayed the people’s trust. The pattern of behaviour; the consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection of the Managing Agent which suggests a serious rot is happening. ” Today, Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is clearly “ rotting ” and “ the rot is serious ” and the PAP regime “ has betrayed the people’s trust ” with a “ pattern of behaviour ” that includes a “ consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection ” by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime and Lee Hsien Loong’s Attorney-General, in...