5th Day of Trial

-
21 August 2017


Thank you to those who came today for the half-day hearing. Please note that tomorrow's hearing (22 Aug) will also be a half day hearing beginning at 10 am.

 NUS' (former) Vice-Provost Lily Kong was at the witness stand today and will continue to testify tomorrow. I believe that the 2nd NUS witness, Assoc Prof Ang Siau Gek will be called tomorrow. A/P Ang was NUS University Registrar and Head of the Registrar's Office from 2004 to 2016. 

Prof Lily Kong's Evidence

Prof Kong gave evidence on many issues. I will just show one document and let the document speak for itself. (I have reproduced the chain of emails and pasted the chain directly as text in this post.)

 Background: Before NUS convened the COI hearing in July 2005 to look into my complaint against Dr Wong Yunn Chii, I asked Prof Kong for the issues that Prof Kong had commissioned the COI to look into, also known as the Terms of Reference. Prof Kong refused to provide the Terms of Reference to me.

In June 2005, I asked Prof Kong to clarify what she meant when she said there were contradictions in my complaint against Dr Wong. A series of exchanges followed. (See emails below.)

The chain of emails is reproduced here:


-----Original Message-----
From: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie

Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:01 PM
To: Lily Kong (Vice Provost)
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?

Dear Prof Kong,



Do you feel that my emails lack "respect or decorum"?  I am almost begging for a clarification about what you have said to me, can I not ask for a clarification?



I am the one who has a grievance.  I am trying to have my grievance heard by the University.  It is a complaint against a University faculty member.  Do I not even have the right to ensure that there is absolutely no room for misunderstanding and mis-interpretation on the University's part?  


Thank you very much for your attention.

I remain, as always, yours respecfully and sincerely,
Leu-Jiun


-----Original Message-----
From: Lily Kong (Vice Provost)
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 1:45 PM
To: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie
Cc: Lau Ai Lee; Ang Siau Gek (Head, REG)
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?
Dear Leu-Jiun

The panel will clarify with you what in fact you are unhappy about. 

Please treat this as my last email to you.

I trust you will leave some room for respect and decorum in your messages.
----------------------------------------------
Prof Lily Kong
Vice-Provost (Education)
National University of Singapore
http://profile.nus.edu.sg/fass/geokongl/
"This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you."


-----Original Message-----
From: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie
Sent: 05 July 2005 13:42
To: Lily Kong (Vice Provost)
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?
Dear Prof. Kong,

I hope you would clarify the "contradictions" that you have referred to.  Since it is you who charge me with being 'contradictory' in my emails, and not the "panel", I can only come to you for clarification on this matter. 

I still do not know what are the "contradictions".  So the "contradictions" must either be backed up or withdrawn.

I take my complaint seriously.  The complaint is about a faculty member of the University.  There cannot be room for any misunderstanding on the University's part before it goes ahead with its "investigation".

Please clarify what you mean by "contradictions".  Thank you.

Yours respectfully,
Leu-Jiun

P/S     I have asked Ms Lau Ai Lee some questions.  I have also informed her that I cannot attend the "interview" on 7th July, if I do not receive full answers from her to my questions.   
-----Original Message-----
From: Lily Kong (Vice Provost)
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 5:28 PM
To: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie
Cc: Lau Ai Lee; Ang Siau Gek (Head, REG)
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?
Leu-Jiun

I have delegated the task of looking into your issues to a panel.  You will have received my letter about the same.
----------------------------------------------
Prof Lily Kong
Vice-Provost (Education)
National University of Singapore
http://profile.nus.edu.sg/fass/geokongl/
"This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you."
-----Original Message-----
From: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie
Sent: 02 July 2005 15:38
To: Lily Kong (Vice Provost)
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?
Dear Prof. Kong,

I am still looking forward to your reply to the questions I asked you in my email to you dated 23rd June 2005.

The email is attached below for your reference.

Thank you very much.

Yours sincerely,
Leu-Jiun
-----Original Message-----
From: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie
Sent: Thu 6/23/2005 6:39 PM
To: Lily Kong (Vice Provost)
Cc:
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?
Dear Prof. Kong,

Thank you for your message which you sent through your secretary to me on 20th June.

I would appreciate it if you would please help me with the following questions.

1)         In your message you said that “… there are contradictions between what you write below and what you indicated categorically in your earlier emails…” – What do you mean by that? 

2)         In your letter dated 7th June, you mentioned that an “independent panel” would be convened to “investigate the matter”.  Could you please tell me how is the panel “independent”?

3)         Would the “investigation” be transparent?

4)         Who are the members of the “independent panel”?

The reason why I have asked for a second meeting with you after our first brief meeting on 10th June is mainly to clarify such issues and questions. 

I am disappointed that you seem to be unwilling to meet with me.

Thank you for your attention to the matter so far.

Sincerely yours,
Leu-Jiun
-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Seah
Sent: Mon 6/20/2005 9:57 AM
To: Ten Leu-Jiun Jeanne - Marie
Cc: Ang Siau Gek (Head, REG); Lau Ai Lee
Subject: RE: Could I please meet with you?
Dear Leu-Jiun

Appended below is Prof Kong's message for your attention please:

==============================================================================================
All your email messages to date will constitute your complaints against your supervisor.  The Registrar's Office will be in touch with you should the panel need to speak to you.   As there are contradictions between what you write below and what you indicated categorically in your earlier emails, you may wish to clarify your position with the panel.  
============================================================================================== 

Kind regards,
Amy Seah
MSO to Vice-Provost (Education)

 






Popular posts from this blog

Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP Regime is “Rotting” According to the Reasoning of Heng Swee Keat

-
1 December 2023 What do I mean when I say that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” ? I have been asked what I meant by the word “rot” when I wrote that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting.” Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” in the sense in which Heng Swee Keat used the words “rotting” and “rot” during a  speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015 , when Heng Swee Keat said that “ the Town Council is rotting. And the rot is serious. … the Workers’ Party has betrayed the people’s trust. The pattern of behaviour; the consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection of the Managing Agent which suggests a serious rot is happening. ”   Today, Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is clearly “ rotting ” and “ the rot is serious ” and the PAP regime “ has betrayed the people’s trust ” with a “ pattern of behaviour ” that includes a “ consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection ” by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime and Lee Hsien Loong’s Attorney-General, in favour o
Read more

Lily Kong is the Perjurer; Wong Yunn Chii is the Plagiarist

-
13 October 2023 In the aftermath of the news that the NTU faculty member who plagiarised his former student’s work had either been terminated or had resigned , I received some questions about Dr Wong Yunn Chii. There is confusion that these two plagiarists are the same person. The two men are different plagiarists. There is also confusion that Lily Kong committed plagiarism against me; which is also inaccurate. Lily Kong is the perjurer who protected Wong Yunn Chii the plagiarist and this happened in NUS. Lily Kong covered up Wong Yunn Chii’s misconduct after I whistle blew on the plagiarism committed by Wong Yunn Chii. Lily Kong then demanded that the whistleblower (I) agree to stop complaining about the coverup of Wong Yunn Chii’s misconduct, as a condition for NUS to award me my master’s degree. Lily Kong then went to Court to dishonestly testify in Court that she did not link the whistleblowing on Wong Yunn Chii to NUS’s decisions to refuse to award the master’s degree to me and to
Read more

A 5-year Legal Battle with NUS

-
Image
My name is Jeanne Ten. I am a Singaporean. My life has been utterly destroyed by the National University of Singapore (NUS). In 2012, I began a long drawn-out legal battle with NUS regarding the wrongful denial of my MA degree (by Research) in 2006. My trial will begin next month on 1 August 2017. To date, I have already spent more than $100,000 in fees. I have exhausted all my savings. I have no choice but to resort to crowdfunding the legal fees. I hope Singaporeans can extend a hand, no matter how small the amount, to uphold justice. (July 2017) Photo Credit: Grace Baey   18 July 2017 Here’s my encounter I started my MA programme at the National University of Singapore (NUS) in January 2002, and I completed my MA thesis in February 2005. NUS passed my MA thesis in 2006 and even sent me the letter for the commencement ceremony. However, several months later, NUS imposed a new requirement for me to graduate – a written undertaking to accept the university’s decisions rega
Read more