Did NUS Have A Copy Of My Thesis That I Submitted to NUS In 2006 In Its Possession All This Time?

-

29 July 2017
 
My case against NUS will be heard on 1-4, 18 and 21 August 2017. It will be at the Supreme Court and it is open to the public.

 There is one issue that I am not allowed to ventilate in Court next week because of Without Prejudice privilege that NUS enjoys, i.e., terms of settlement proposed in the course of a mediation cannot be used in Court generally. Hence, I am discussing it here in this forum.

 This begs the question about what can be discussed in the public domain that is qualified by privilege in Court? Well, there is a judgment on this issue: Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore [2014] SGHC 217. While the honourable Court decided that I could not use the so-called privileged communications to support my legal position in Court, the judgment which provided the grounds for why the statements could not be used in Court and the said statements were published in the world wide web and can be accessed through this link:

 http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15767-ten-leu-jiun-jeanne-marie-v-nationaluniversity-of-singapore-2014-sghc-217


I turned in my MA thesis to NUS in 2006. Absolutely.

I wish to deal with one issue that continues to unsettle me a lot and causes me great vexation. It is a question about whether if I turned in my MA thesis to NUS in 2006. The answer is "YES." And NUS disclosed this finalised copy of my thesis during litigation in 2013.

 On 31 August 2006, I emailed a softcopy of my finalised thesis in pdf format to NUS. At that time I was already overseas in my PhD studies. NUS acknowledged the receipt of my thesis in softcopy format almost immediately. I have the emails to back up this claim that I make here.

 In 2011, through my MP Mr Seah Kian Peng, I made a complaint to MOE regarding NUS' wrongful termination of my MA candidature and wrongful denial of my MA degree. As this issue could not be resolved to my satisfaction, I commenced litigation against NUS in 2012.

 For the avoidance of doubt, I did not ask MOE to mediate with NUS in 2011. I complained to MOE about NUS.

 The Court has decided that while I did not ask MOE to mediate my complaint against NUS, MOE acted in a "mediatory capacity" when it conveyed NUS' position to me (See [36] to [41] in the above-mentioned judgment).

 In my 2011 communications with MOE, MOE appeared to think that I did not turn in my MA thesis to NUS back in 2006.

 I tried to explain to MOE that I had indeed turned in a copy of my finalised thesis in 2006, but MOE apparently chose to believe NUS. I am not at liberty to say more. I refer to what was published in the above-mentioned judgment at [47] which is a quote from MOE with my emphasis in highlights:
 
Source:  Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore [2014] SGHC 217 at [47]
http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/15767-ten-leu-jiun-jeanne-marie-v-nationaluniversity-of-singapore-2014-sghc-217

IN CONVEYING ITS POSITION TO MOE, NUS ALSO TOLD MOE THAT NUS DID NOT HAVE A COPY OF MY MA THESIS IN ITS FILES. THIS IS NOT TRUE. IT IS UNFORTUNATE FOR ME THAT NUS WILL NOW GET AWAY IN COURT WITHOUT HAVING TO ANSWER TO ME WHY IT TOLD MOE IN 2011 THAT IT DID NOT HAVE A COPY OF MY THESIS IN ITS RECORDS WHEN IT OBVIOUSLY HAD A COPY OF MY MA THESIS ALL THIS TIME SINCE 2006!!!

Have a great weekend and please support my litigation fund if you have some change to spare (details below).

 Sincerely,
Jeanne Ten

Donation Details 

Paypal:
tljvnus@gmail.com


Bank: 
POSB Everyday Savings Account 193-69702-0

Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie

DBS Bank Pte Ltd

12 Marina Boulevard,
DBS Asia Central,
Marina Bay Financial Centre Tower 3,
Singapore 018982
Singapore

Bank swift code:
DBSSSGSG

Branch code:
081






Popular posts from this blog

A 5-year Legal Battle with NUS

-
Image
My name is Jeanne Ten. I am a Singaporean. My life has been utterly destroyed by the National University of Singapore (NUS). In 2012, I began a long drawn-out legal battle with NUS regarding the wrongful denial of my MA degree (by Research) in 2006. My trial will begin next month on 1 August 2017. To date, I have already spent more than $100,000 in fees. I have exhausted all my savings. I have no choice but to resort to crowdfunding the legal fees. I hope Singaporeans can extend a hand, no matter how small the amount, to uphold justice. (July 2017) Photo Credit: Grace Baey   18 July 2017 Here’s my encounter I started my MA programme at the National University of Singapore (NUS) in January 2002, and I completed my MA thesis in February 2005. NUS passed my MA thesis in 2006 and even sent me the letter for the commencement ceremony. However, several months later, NUS imposed a new requirement for me to graduate – a written undertaking to accept the university’s decisions rega
Read more

Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP Regime is “Rotting” According to the Reasoning of Heng Swee Keat

-
1 December 2023 What do I mean when I say that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” ? I have been asked what I meant by the word “rot” when I wrote that Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting.” Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is “rotting” in the sense in which Heng Swee Keat used the words “rotting” and “rot” during a  speech in Parliament on 13 February 2015 , when Heng Swee Keat said that “ the Town Council is rotting. And the rot is serious. … the Workers’ Party has betrayed the people’s trust. The pattern of behaviour; the consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection of the Managing Agent which suggests a serious rot is happening. ”   Today, Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime is clearly “ rotting ” and “ the rot is serious ” and the PAP regime “ has betrayed the people’s trust ” with a “ pattern of behaviour ” that includes a “ consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection ” by Lee Hsien Loong’s PAP regime and Lee Hsien Loong’s Attorney-General, in favour o
Read more

Lily Kong is the Perjurer; Wong Yunn Chii is the Plagiarist

-
13 October 2023 In the aftermath of the news that the NTU faculty member who plagiarised his former student’s work had either been terminated or had resigned , I received some questions about Dr Wong Yunn Chii. There is confusion that these two plagiarists are the same person. The two men are different plagiarists. There is also confusion that Lily Kong committed plagiarism against me; which is also inaccurate. Lily Kong is the perjurer who protected Wong Yunn Chii the plagiarist and this happened in NUS. Lily Kong covered up Wong Yunn Chii’s misconduct after I whistle blew on the plagiarism committed by Wong Yunn Chii. Lily Kong then demanded that the whistleblower (I) agree to stop complaining about the coverup of Wong Yunn Chii’s misconduct, as a condition for NUS to award me my master’s degree. Lily Kong then went to Court to dishonestly testify in Court that she did not link the whistleblowing on Wong Yunn Chii to NUS’s decisions to refuse to award the master’s degree to me and to
Read more